The Pay Was Poor Even Back Then

I came across this sign inside a replica of an old, late 19th century/early 20th century school house.  Look at the pay back then. An online money converter has $10.00 (1877) per month equal to approximately $198.62 per month in 2006 and $35.00 (1902) per month equal to $846.04 per month in 2006 as well.  I wonder why some of the women listed were paid more than women in the year before and after them?  Hmmmmmm. 

Notice the little notes about the ones who “gave up.”   What can I say, educating America’s youth wasn’t easy then and sure isn’t easy now.  Enjoy!

Old Time School House 1

Photo taken by School Teacher                                                  Conversion: MeasuringWorth.com

6 Responses to “The Pay Was Poor Even Back Then”

  1. ann adams Says:

    Some things never change. If I had my way, you’d be paid what you’re worth with a little extra thrown in for hazardous duty.

  2. jd2718 Says:

    How do you pronounce “Celoa” ?

    And I’m wondering if the pay was affected by economic slumps. They were rather frequent, I think.

  3. thirdgradeteacher Says:

    Wait — so giving up is an option?! Why didn’t someone tell me… :-)

  4. NYC Educator Says:

    If I were Jennie, I’d probably have to kill Lettie.

  5. MondayMorningPower Says:

    Some things never change. I seem to gravitate to teacher blogs….I guess it’s because my wife is a middle school teacher in Simi Valley CA and hear all of the complaints.

    I would like to invite you to take a look at my site; it gets high marks form the teacher community. It is pure “positivity.” Anyways, the url is http://mondaymorningpower.blogspot.com. If you come by, leave a comment so that I know you were there. I believe our blogs are complimentary. If you like what you see I would like to propose a link swap. Let me know if you agree by leaving me a comment; just be nice.
    Take care,

  6. mrs t Says:

    I’m wondering if “gave up” means that the teacher “gave up” her salary?

Leave a Reply